In the huaqiao changshi textbook, many of the chapters remained the same as the similar version from the 1930s. The importance of waking up early, studying, being respectful to teachers, and staying clean and hygienic remain. There are still chapters on the various systems of the body, on the importance of vaccinations, and the history and geography of China.
The differences, however, reveal much about the kind of identity these textbooks wanted to create. The new curriculum textbooks of the 1930s were meant to give the huaqiao in Southeast Asia the impression that they are also part of China. Thus, there were many chapters on the flags of the GMD, Sun Yat Sen's biography and contribution to the building of a new
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj1PyfsIQLFHUGpQJFW_yUPfQtWAxf4wYC4Xc7Wxu36W7otw_k6_y557gxHJvCDOYo_95UeaEkebUNCe4yl68fpzjRi7V74RDO5bRKyr0f-Oys1W2Su_0qGT5GprKLCIIlg-GdKk1ijQLYe/s320/America+NOT+1.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6_0_YpP5qalsszmG8PmjQXJ24FMqVjywa7ykJxdik6zQTZgc4S6dk9MRRWd917XVLM8nGmkuAcKID2ZqqQfxVas8YZi4lP_4PF1icv-NSKPQu5QGqhkAIj8P_1LDPJf79DK7EHZC8LOA4/s320/multiethnic+China.jpg)
What I think we can take from this is that these textbooks wanted these huaqiao to feel Chinese, but perhaps Chinese in a Hong Kong sense. At this point, Hong Kong had no loyalties to either government, and instead prided itself on being an international section of greater China, committed to the greatness and richness of Chinese culture that developed over 3000 years, but entirely divorced from the battles of the present. This is also made evident through the pictures. One picture that immediately stuck out to me (probably because it seemed so American)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiChREuxYPMTlyBUB6hWz9uBT5aYo3Rbtii3QcZQ6OOMMffrmgFQhZ1BcMmzbJIyWXs6D7UfURiNZclCfS_XMFOZbayLES9Vtn0ZpQGDrWJkPhEYQT0QmjuU9YM3yoACQ7OM-hBe1IrVIIN/s320/PC.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjGF4_8pAHQtAR5tQ79qoY6kHggJzyMkgLoJVtEtmxu3c0GJFXMiSDoPFajd0Iw8uEOcdHKIhqDMiXt5qEzxwsa5XHzLDYwWZTGsJ-aA1jKrGhEaK-Fre6nmxlygPIixQsxBaXz4bkTZgdd/s320/exercise.jpg)
The Shanghai published textbook, however, took a very clear political stance; this shouldn't really surprise anyone since by 1961, when this textbook was published, everything was controlled and created by the Communist party. There are major themes we see in this volume of this textbook. The beginning few chapters are all history of China. The next few chapters are about basic science and elements, such as water, air, metal and steel. After that, the chapters are on physiology and health. Finally, the last few chapters are on astronomy and science, including the rotations of the earth, seasons, and the lunar calendar.
The history section was largely rewritten. The first man ever was actually found outside of Beijing. We then had the Shang dynasty which led to 10,000 years of feudalism, and apparently history was stagnant up until the 1840s when China had a threat from imperialist nations. The communist narrative for history shouldn't surprise us. But all of the information about science was equally politically revealing. There is a chart included in the book of Chinese steel production, seen on the lower right; since this textbook was published right around the time of the Great Leap Forward, steel was currently an important subject. However, there was also important historical ties that were created to steel; not only was it considered most important to our "socialist revolution" but bronze (which was the next chapter) was important culturally and historically in the bronze age. Although the textbook was important to point out
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgSDVL9o-PIW8bJgYBhQFdHF-MWbAuerbOiJRSJYks0rgAoHF2DbviFCPwIOciAKdK4M97ghwUaDxgIEsqwup-oE-szt5wt1sdyoxnU85QgqeRTOEthP4ED9hqs9UYlhT5UTUBup8hgbiys/s320/Steel+production.jpg)
While it is possible that more ties to the Communist party and nationalism are made in other textbooks, or perhaps other volumes of this textbook, it seems that those ties have already been made quite clear. Instead, changshi has become "everyday knowledge we need to be productive members of the nation." The difference between cows and horses, and fun activities on children's day are no longer important. All of our knowledge comes back to making people working cogs of the communist nation.
These two textbooks create two very interesting discourses of what it means to be Chinese at this point. One is very clearly tied to the communist narrative, while one is very cultural and historical, but completely divorced from politics and more immersed in an international kind of environment. I believe, however, that as I find other textbooks, other narratives will begin to come forth.
No comments:
Post a Comment